Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guy Stalnaker's avatar

This one of the reasons why I love opera and why I own so many recordings of them - directors and performers bring themselves to a work and make it new each time (as opposed to several friends of mine who have "their favorite" recordings and have no desire to hear other recordings). As a sometimes composer myself, I very much appreciate Adams' perspective. There are *many* people who think of music, especially classical musics, as writ in stone (one must abide by the composer's directions, etc.). I am not one of those people. It is both exhilarating and humbling to put a work "out there" and have it performed, especially if one gives it away and explicitly allows interpretive or even modifications of a work. I like the 'recipe' model.

I think non-classical musics are also interpreted by performers. The Great American Songbook is full of works performed by myriad performers who interpret the songs from their own perspectives with their own gifts. Pop, rock, and blues have tunes that are similarly interpreted, especially songs written by the great songwriters (Bob Dylan, Paul Simon, John Lennon & Paul McCartney, Leonard Cohen, Carole King, etc.). Think how many versions of Cohen's Hallelujah you may have heard, or Lennon & McCartney's Blackbird.

Expand full comment
Janet Hough's avatar

While I enjoy listening to opera, the extent of my familiarity is really what I picked up as a kid listening to what my dad listened to many years ago in the era of Callas, Sutherland et al. So I have never heard Sondra Radvanovsky. My goodness, what a joy!! Of them all, she's the one I went back to and replayed and replayed. Thank you, Michele, for this!!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts